Chest Press vs Bench Press: Which Builds a Better Chest?
Chest press vs bench press compared: muscles worked, EMG and muscle growth evidence, why the weights never convert, and which to pick for your goal.
By Nadia Popescu, Strength & Conditioning Writer · Updated 11 November 2026
Reformer Pilates does build muscle if you're new to resistance work, and it counts as strength training in the sense the NHS uses the term. It is a weak tool for building a lot of muscle, though, because the springs top out and you can't add load in small measured steps the way you can with a barbell or dumbbells. Most people who do two classes a week will get stronger through the trunk, hips and shoulders for the first few months and then plateau unless the work gets harder.
So the answer depends on what you mean by "build muscle". If you mean firmer, stronger and better at holding a plank, yes. If you mean visibly bigger quads and glutes a year from now, reformer work alone won't get you there.
A reformer is a carriage on rails, held towards the footbar by springs. You push or pull the carriage away, the springs stretch, and your muscles work against that tension in both directions. That makes it resistance training by any reasonable definition.
A spring doesn't behave like a weight. A 10kg dumbbell weighs 10kg at every point of a curl, whereas a spring pulls harder the further you stretch it, so the load is lightest at the start of the movement and heaviest at the end. For footwork (the lying leg press that opens most classes) the springs are slackest when your knees are deeply bent, which is where a squat with a barbell is hardest. Your legs get the most resistance near lockout, where they're already at their strongest.
There's also a ceiling. Studio machines usually carry five springs, and once they're all hooked on, that's the maximum. Tensions aren't standardised between brands, so we won't quote kilogram figures for studio reformers. Budget home machines do sometimes publish them: TODO lists its folding reformer at four 22lb springs plus five 13lb cords, 153lb (about 69kg) in total at full stretch, per the listing. A healthy adult can leg press far more than that with two legs within a few months of training, which is why footwork stops feeling hard so quickly.
The upside of springs is the return. The carriage wants to snap back and you have to slow it down, so the lowering half of every rep is loaded. That is useful for muscle, and it's the part most people rush.
The research is more positive than sceptics assume and much thinner than studios imply.
The trial that ranks for this question is a 2025 randomised controlled trial in Scientific Reports. It put 47 overweight and obese women aged 30 to 60 into either reformer Pilates three times a week for 8 weeks or a control group. The reformer group improved grip strength and trunk endurance, lost body fat, and their muscle mass rose from 24.9kg to 25.6kg on average (Gökalp and Kirmizigil, 2025). That's roughly 0.7kg in two months, which is a real beginner gain. Two caveats matter. The team measured muscle with bioelectrical impedance scales, which are sensitive to hydration and less trustworthy than a DXA scan; and the participants were untrained, the group in whom almost any new resistance exercise adds muscle.
Pooled evidence is cooler. A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 Pilates trials in roughly 540 adult women found significant drops in body weight and BMI and better flexibility, but no significant pooled effect on lean body mass, body fat percentage, handgrip strength or vertical jump (Sports, 2026). The authors add that individual studies point to better muscular strength and endurance, and they flag how varied the trials are. That review mixes mat and equipment Pilates, so it isn't a pure test of the reformer.
What about Pilates against other training? A 2022 systematic review of 11 randomised trials found no difference between Pilates and other exercise methods for dynamic strength, isometric strength or muscular endurance, and graded that evidence very low to low (Heliyon, 2022). Read it carefully: it says nobody has shown Pilates to be worse, in small and short studies, mostly in beginners and older adults. It doesn't show that a reformer matches a squat rack for a trained lifter, and no trial we could find has tested that directly.
Our reading of all three: reformer Pilates reliably improves strength endurance and core function, adds a little muscle to people starting from a low base, and has no evidence behind it for substantial long-term muscle growth.
For public health purposes, yes. The NHS tells adults to do strengthening activities that work all the major muscle groups on at least 2 days a week, and it names Pilates in its list of examples next to lifting weights and resistance bands (NHS physical activity guidelines).
The same page sets a condition that many classes miss. To get the benefit, you should do strength exercises "to the point where you need a short rest before repeating the activity". A flowing 45 minute class on light springs, where no muscle ever gets close to tired, is mobility work with a nice soundtrack. A class where your legs shake on the last four reps of a single-leg press counts.
For a lifter's definition of strength training, meaning progressively heavier loads over months, the reformer falls short. You can't add 1kg a week to a spring.
Reformer work is strongest where load matters less than control.
It's weakest for the quads, chest and lats, the big muscles that need heavy loads to keep growing. Our reformer Pilates exercises guide covers the seven moves most classes are built on.
| Reformer Pilates | Free weights | |
|---|---|---|
| Type of resistance | Springs: light at the start, heavier as they stretch | Constant load through the whole rep |
| Maximum load | Capped by the springs fitted | Limited only by the plates you own |
| Progression | Coarse steps, one spring at a time, often unlabelled | Small measured jumps, 1kg to 2.5kg |
| Muscle growth | Small gains in beginners; no pooled effect on lean mass | Well established at every training level |
| Core and control | Excellent | Good, mostly as a by-product |
| Bone loading | Low: you're lying or kneeling, with no impact | Higher, particularly standing lifts |
| Joint stress | Low | Depends on load and technique |
| Cost | £15 to £30 a class, or about £250 upwards for a home machine | A pair of adjustable dumbbells covers most needs |
The bone row deserves a sentence. The Royal Osteoporosis Society's advice is that bones respond best to a combination of impact exercise done on your feet and strength exercise that builds up gradually (ROS: exercise for bones). Most reformer work happens lying down against moderate tension, so it supplies little of the first and only some of the second. If bone density is a reason you exercise, add standing strength work and some impact.
Muscle grows when sets are hard, and sets finishing close to failure appear to grow more than easy ones; we cover that research in our piece on whether resistance bands build muscle, which applies here because bands and springs share the same rising resistance. Four changes make reformer sessions harder.
When lighter is harder
On planks, pikes and other moves where you hold the carriage still, taking a spring off makes the exercise tougher because the carriage slides more easily. Heavier springs only mean more work when you're pushing or pulling against them.
Even with all four, you'll reach a point where single-leg footwork on full springs is comfortable for 20 reps. That's the machine's limit.
You don't have to choose. The two fill each other's gaps, and three or four sessions a week is enough.
A pair of adjustable dumbbells is enough equipment for the weights sessions and takes up less floor than a yoga mat. If you'd sooner not own weights, a set of resistance bands will handle the rows and presses, though they share the spring's limits on heavy leg work.
Studio classes cost £15 to £30 each in most of the UK, so twice a week runs past £1,500 a year. A folding home machine pays for itself quickly if you'll use it, and our breakdown of how much a Pilates reformer costs sets out the price tiers.
For muscle, the question to ask of any home reformer is how much resistance it has. Cord-only machines are the weakest, and spring machines with published tensions are easiest to progress on. The TODO folding reformer is one of the few budget models that states its numbers (153lb across four springs and five cords), and it costs around £285 at the time of writing. It only suits users up to about 5ft 9in, so taller readers should look at the ZERELEK or the other machines in our best Pilates reformer UK guide.
Check price on Amazon£284.99Reformer Pilates builds a modest amount of muscle in beginners, a lot of core endurance in almost everyone, and meets the NHS strengthening guideline when you work hard enough to need a rest between sets. It won't keep building muscle for years, and it does little for your bones. Keep the reformer for what it does well and lift something heavy once or twice a week for the rest.
Yes, if you're new to resistance training. An 8 week randomised trial of reformer Pilates in 47 women recorded a small rise in muscle mass alongside better grip strength and core endurance. Pooled data across 12 Pilates trials found no significant change in lean body mass, though, so expect modest gains that slow down once the springs stop challenging you.
It's resistance training, because your muscles work against spring tension, and the NHS lists Pilates as a muscle-strengthening activity. It isn't the same as lifting progressively heavier weights. The load is lighter, harder to measure and capped by the springs on the machine, so it builds endurance and control more readily than maximum strength.
It can. The NHS asks adults to do strengthening activities that work all the major muscle groups on at least 2 days a week, and names Pilates as an example. The condition is effort: the NHS says strength exercises should be done to the point where you need a short rest before repeating them. A gentle class where nothing gets tired doesn't meet that bar.
For general fitness and a stronger core, it can stand in for weights for a while. For maximum muscle size, heavy leg strength or bone loading it can't, because springs run out of resistance and there's no impact. Two reformer sessions plus one or two short weights sessions a week covers what either misses on its own.
The trials that found changes used two or three sessions a week for 8 to 12 weeks. Two hard sessions beat four easy ones: pick spring settings that leave you within a few reps of failing by the end of each set.
It has the edge, because springs add external resistance that you can increase and bodyweight mat work can't match on leg and arm exercises. Head-to-head trials are small, so treat that as a reasoned advantage. Mat work is still demanding for the abdominals.
Chest press vs bench press compared: muscles worked, EMG and muscle growth evidence, why the weights never convert, and which to pick for your goal.
The Cindy CrossFit workout explained: 20 minutes of 5 pull-ups, 10 push-ups and 15 squats. What a good score is, pacing maths, scaling and a 4-week plan.
How to do the cross body hammer curl (pinwheel curl): step-by-step form, muscles worked, how it differs from a standard hammer curl, mistakes, sets and reps.
PPLUL split explained: a full 5-day push, pull, legs, upper, lower programme with sets, reps and rest, plus a home-gym version and progression rules.
Best Exercise is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.co.uk. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. This comes at no extra cost to you and never influences our independent reviews or rankings.